CHSL (LDC AND DEO) NON QUALIFIED CANDIDATES MARKS ON SSC WEBSITE

1 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION COMBINED HIGHER SECONDARY (10+2) EXAMINATION, 2010 MARKS OF NON-QUALIFIED /REJECTED CANDIDATES IN WRITTEN PART The Staff Selection Commission conducted an open competitive examination for the post of Data Entry Operator and LDC on 27&28.11.2010 on all India basis. A total of 9,91,514 candidates appeared in the said examination. The result of the written part was declared on 14.01.2010 and posted on the Commission’s website wherein 17507 candidates have been declared qualified in the written part for being called for Data Entry Skill Test and Typing Test on Computer. 2 . Candidate except those qualified in the written part can ascertain his/her marks through the website by entering their Roll No./Name. The particulars of the candidates appearing on the website are based on the coding (blackening the corresponding rectangles in pencil) of their particulars by the candidates on the first page of OMR Answer Sheet. The candidate had already been cautioned through instructions given in the front page of OMR sheet that “Answer Book not bearing candidate’s Name, Roll No. & Ticket No. will not be evaluated and such candidate would be awarded “ZERO” marks”. “Please ensure that you have written and coded your particulars correctly to avoid rejection. Further, Note-II under Para-19 of the Notice for the Examination also cautioned the candidate that “Candidate should note that answer sheets not bearing Candidate’s Name, Roll Number, Signature, Ticket Number and Test Form Number (Blackening the relevant rectangle as per instructions given to the candidates) will not be evaluated and such candidates would be awarded “ZERO” mark. In other words, wrong coding or no coding leads to no evaluation”. Accordingly, the OMR sheets of the candidates whose scripts were without their signature or who have wrongly coded their particulars on first page of OMR Answer Sheet, have been rejected and awarded zero marks. 3. Mistakes/Discrepancies committed by the candidates have been indicated in code against the respective candidates which are as under: Code Abbreviation WS Without Signature Roll No. Roll No. (Wrong/Incomplete) DUP ROLL Duplicate Roll No. (Coded roll no. is of other candidate) TF Test Form No. (Wrong/Incomplete) TICKNO Ticket No. (Wrong/Incomplete) INV ROLL Invalid Roll No. (Coded roll no. is out of range) DR Duplicate Roll No. (Coded roll no. is of other candidate) 4. The OMR sheets have been scanned and evaluated by computer and marks of the candidates have been generated through computer after thorough checking and verification and are 100% error free. No representations regarding reevaluation of their OMR sheet, re-totaling of marks, etc will be entertained by the Commission. (Satya Prakash) Under Secretary(C-I) Dated 19.01.2011