STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION
Declaration of Final Result for the Post of Sub-Inspectors
in Central Police Organizations(CPOs) Examination, 2009 (For MALE candidates only)
The Staff Selection Commission conducted Sub-Inspectors in Central Police
Organizations (CPOs), Examination, 2009 on 06.09.2009. On the basis of candidates'
performance in Paper-I, 30437 male candidates were declared eligible for appearing in the
Physical Endurance Test (PET)/Medical Test. 7196 candidates qualified in PET. Out of 7196
candidates who were declared to have qualified in PET, 5166 candidates were declared qualified
in medical test and out of 5166 candidates, 3505 candidates qualified in written part (Paper-I+II)
for Interview.
2. Following is the category-wise statement of 1995 candidates (including 37 withheld
cases), who have found their place in the Select List on the basis of aggregate marks secured by
them in both the papers as well as marks obtained by them in the Personality Test, for
appointment against the post of Sub - Inspector in the different CPOs :-
BSF
Category SC ST OBC EXS UR TOTAL
Vacancies 38 20 68 35 127 253
Filled 38 20 68 5 127 253
UR filled vacancies include (ST = 1, SC = 1, OBC = 7)
CISF
Category SC ST OBC EXS UR TOTAL
Vacancies 202 101 364 150 683 1350
Filled 202 101 364 93 683 1350
UR filled vacancies include (ST = 16, SC = 29, OBC = 149, EXS = 6)
CRPF
Category SC ST OBC EXS UR TOTAL
Vacancies 53 26 95 35 178 352
Filled 53 26 95 1 178 352
UR filled vacancies include (ST = 3, SC =7, OBC = 13)
ITBP
Category SC ST OBC EXS UR TOTAL
Vacancies 01 02 08 02 11 22
Filled 01 02 08 02 11 22
UR filled vacancies include (ST = 1, OBC = 2)
SSB
Category SC ST OBC EXS UR TOTAL
Vacancies 07 0 04 05 07 18
Filled 07 0 04 01 07 18
UR filled vacancies include (OBC = 2)
-2-
3. Marks obtained by the first and last selected candidates (category wise) in respect
of each CPO are given below. Marks obtained by the first and last candidates in above
allocations are based on their merit cum preference.
B.S.F
Category SC ST 0BC EXS UR
First Selected candidate 288 305 336 276 367
Last Selected candidate 200 267 261 230 281
C.I.S.F
Category SC ST 0BC EXS UR
First Selected candidate 343 352 379 293 426
Last Selected candidate 224 275 271 198 295
CRPF
Category SC ST 0BC EXS UR
First Selected candidate 288 282 367 239 366
Last Selected candidate 214 269 262 239 284
I.T.B.P
Category SC ST 0BC EXS UR
First Selected candidate - 298 302 267 417
Last Selected candidate - 274 266 193 311
S.S.B
Category SC ST 0BC EXS UR
First Selected candidate 279 - 375 257 374
Last Selected candidate 223 - 331 257 338
Note :- Marks obtained by the first and last candidates in above CPOs are based on their
merit-cum-preference.
4. Some candidates who have obtained the said minimum marks, have not found their place
in the Select List due to limited number of vacancies and tie cases. In case of tie, due to equal
marks in grand total (Paper-I+Paper-II+Interview), the candidates having higher in marks in
Paper-I+Paper-II have been given higher rank. In case, candidates got equal marks in Paper-
I+Paper-II, the candidates having higher marks in Paper-I have been given higher rank.
Furthermore, in the event of candidates having equal marks in Paper-I, candidates born earlier
have been given higher rank. If the tie still persists, it has been resolved by alphabetical order of
name.
5. The result of four candidates bearing Roll No. 2405014520, 2405002815, 2405000833
and of Mr. Rahul Singh – ref. case no. 492/2010 have not been processed at this stage as per the
order of Hon’ble Court.
-3-
6. The candidature of 37 candidates have been withheld, pending clarification from
respective RDs/DDs. The roll numbers of 37 candidates whose results are withheld are
given below.
2201000094 2201001825 2201002112 2201008845 2201010937 2201011931 2201014868 2405000698
2405001278 2405003960 2405004072 2405005947 2405006717 2405008224 2405008713 2405011135
2405013354 2405013636 2405015530 3003000976 3003001624 3003001842 3003004924 3003006738
3003006772 3007001119 3010001386 3201000078 3206001908 3206002680 3206003527 3206004216
3206004278 5401000029 8201000496 8201001374 8401000262
7. Candidates have been allocated to the different services on the basis of their merit cum
order of preferences given by them in the application form. In case no preference has been
given by any candidate for any of the services, he/she has not been considered for any of the
services in CPOs.
8. The above said Lists are purely provisional and subject to the recommended candidates
fulfilling all the eligibility conditions prescribed for the respective post in the Notice of
Examination and also subject to thorough verification of their identity with reference to their
photographs, signatures, handwritings, etc., on the application forms, admission certificates, etc.
The candidature of the candidates are liable to be cancelled by respective Regional Directors in
case candidates found not fulfilling the eligibility conditions or any other genuine reasons.
9. For candidates belonging to reserved categories for whom certain percentage of
vacancies are reserved as per Government Policy, the category status is indicated against their
Roll Numbers. It is important to note that some of these candidates have been declared qualified
only for the category mentioned against their Roll Numbers. If any candidate does not actually
belong to the category mentioned against his/her name, he/she may not be eligible to be included
in the list. It is, therefore, in the interest of the candidates concerned to immediately contact the
respective Regional Office of the Commission in all such cases where they do not belong to the
category shown against their Roll Numbers.
This result is also available on SSC's Website: http://ssc.nic.in.
(Satya Prakash)
Under Secretary (C.I)
29.06.2010
No comments:
Post a Comment